Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception"

[Rjack]

7 wrote:

> As I write the assembler code for how a switch statement is implemented,
> then I have copyright over it no matter how it gets subsequently used.
> The assembler code for the switch statement is not generated
> 'automatically'. The exact sequence is something I have to creatively
> interpret and put together reading CPU specification. 

Nonsense.

The structural semantics of a "switch" statement are dictated by the 
programming language specification. The the implementation of that 
structure is dictated by the CPU specification.

So what's so original about that?

Sincerely,
Rjack :)