Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

[Hyman Rosen]

Rjack wrote:
> You are attempting to conflate scope of use restrictions under
> 17 USC 106(1): to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or
> phonorecords;
>
> with scope of use restrictions under 17 USC 106(2): to prepare
> derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;

I'm not conflating them. The GPL covers both.