[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:50:57 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.7.0 |
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:
>Alexander Terekhov wrote:
...
>As always, the case was dismissed because the defendants
>came into compliance with the GPL.
Usually one would say "the case was settled", which means both parties
came to some mutual agreement out of court. "Dismissed" is not the
common term for settlements, even though dismissal would have occurred.
--
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", (continued)
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", David Kastrup, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", none of your buisiness, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!",
Rahul Dhesi <=
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", David Kastrup, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/06