[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
From: |
Chris Ahlstrom |
Subject: |
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:36:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux) |
After takin' a swig o' grog, Hyman Rosen belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>> http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/courtweb/pdf/D02NYSC/01-07482.PDF
>> ... From the user's vantage point, SmartDownload could be analogized
>> to a free neighborhood newspaper, readily obtained from a sidewalk
>> box or supermarket counter without any exchange with a seller or
>> vender.
>
> I'm glad you made the free paper analogy. What do you imagine the
> reaction of the courts would be if someone showed up at the box
> and took all the papers and started reselling them for pulp?
The advertisers in that paper would sure be irked.
Just goes to show you that Terekhov can't even get the basics correct:
>> without any exchange with a seller or vender [sic].
How does he think the paper got produced in the first place?
--
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", (continued)
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Doug Mentohl, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!",
Chris Ahlstrom <=
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Doug Mentohl, 2009/02/07
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/07
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/07
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/07
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Doug Mentohl, 2009/02/08
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/08
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/09
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/09