[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:55:06 +0100

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > You should submit a patch to wikipedia, Hyman.
> >
> No need. From the same site:
>      In other situations (as where the claims have been
>      satisfied by the payment of a certain sum of money)
>      the plaintiff and defendant can simply file a notice
>      that the case has been dismissed.
> That's exactly what has happened in the GPL suits. 

Really? To begin with the notices of dismissal in SFLC cases were NOT
filed by plaintiff AND defendant.

> The claims are satisfied and a notice of dismissal is filed.

Stop being such an idiot, Hyman. Read the SFLC complaints and tell us
exactly what claims were satisfied in any of their frivolous lawsuits. 


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]