|
From: | Rjack |
Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:59:18 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
Rjack <user@example.net> writes: [ still arguing promissory estoppel ]How do you get promissory estoppel without a promise?"2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it...Permission alone is not a promise. What is the writer of the GPL promising to do or not to do?
You're lettin' your ignorance hang out in public Rahul -- that's unbecoming for a genius like you. Sincerely, Rjack :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |