[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation ..
From: |
JEDIDIAH |
Subject: |
Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .. |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:39:24 -0600 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian) |
On 2009-03-06, Rjack <user@example.net> wrote:
> Hadron wrote:
>> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@mouse-potato.com> writes:
>>
>>> In article <1nr90uip7frcg$.10o3bb8tjpbjo.dlg@40tude.net>,
>>> Doctor Smith <iaintgotnostinkinemail@ols.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:04:50 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>>>>>> Would that exempt them from litigation? IANAL, so I
>>>>>>> find this suggestion curious.
>>> ...
>>>>> Also, what on earth is I ANAL ??? And why is Roy discussing
>>>>> it in public ad why does he find it curious?. It's as bad
>>>>> as Marti telling us about his now dead lover.
>>>> It's some oddball term Schestowitz uses on his ICQ channel.
>>> Give me a break--I don't believe for an instance that either of
>>> you do not know what IANAL means. As Wikipedia notes, this is
>>> one of the most popular internet acronyms, and it is almost
>>> impossible for anyone to have the groups both of you read
>>> without having come across it numerous times.
>>
>> I really did not know.
>>
>
> People do not want others to mistake them for lawyers. The late
> Chief Justice Warren Burger lamented, "75 to 90 percent of American
> trial lawyers are incompetent, dishonest, or both."
...sounds suspicously like Sturgeons law.
--
Unfortunately, the universe will not conform itself to
your fantasies. You have to manage based on what really happens |||
rather than what you would like to happen. This is true of personal / | \
affairs, government and business.
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., (continued)
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., amicus_curious, 2009/03/04
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Roy Schestowitz, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Doctor Smith, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Hadron, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Doctor Smith, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Tim Smith, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Hadron, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Peter Köhlmann, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Rjack, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation ..,
JEDIDIAH <=
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., chrisv, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Rjack, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Ezekiel, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., RonB, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Doctor Smith, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., amicus_curious, 2009/03/06
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/05
- Re: MS partner sues Red Hat for patent violation .., Tim Smith, 2009/03/05