Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
Please don't spank me Professor Dhesi. I was probably reading
the ALR's Restatement of Contracts and Corbin on Contracts when
you were still peeing in a diaper.
If that is true, it would explain a lot. You would have been
doing what you claim to have "probably" done long before free and
open software came into being into its current form. And
therefore, the law that you "probably" studied was never intended
to deal with free and open software. And while the law might
have adapted to deal with changing circumstances, (e.g., within
the CAFC), you perhaps are still living in the good old days when
people wrote software strictly as a job.