[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More FSF hypocrisy
From: |
Thufir Hawat |
Subject: |
Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:11:54 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:37:37 -0400, Rjack wrote:
> Rjack doesn't accept the rationalization of piracy due the thief's state
> of mind or motive. The difference between commercial and non-commercial
> piracy is comparable to the difference between being pregnant and a
> "little bit" pregnant.
Who does accept the rationalization of piracy? Be specific with an
example.
-Thufir
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, (continued)
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, JEDIDIAH, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy,
Thufir Hawat <=
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
Re: More FSF hypocrisy, amicus_curious, 2009/03/23