gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More FSF hypocrisy


From: Rahul Dhesi
Subject: Re: More FSF hypocrisy
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:54:12 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: nn/6.7.0

Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> writes, following up to Rjack:

>How can there be a contract when there's been no agreement between the
>parties involved?....

Rjack already lost this argument under a different subject heading.
Each time he loses an argument he reposts it under a new subject
heading. See the previous subject heading "Tom Tom and Microsofts Linux
patent lock-down ..".

Rjack found cases where the court used contract law to determine a
remedy for a license violation. Seeing the word "contract", he came to
the erroneous conclusion that, just because you can base a remedy on
contract law, therefore there is no difference between a license and a
contract. And therefore, you no longer need an offer an an acceptance to
form a contract.

So now, let me predict: We will soon see Rjack repost the same flawed
argument under yet another subject heading.
-- 
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]