Re: More FSF hypocrisy

[Rjack]

Rahul Dhesi wrote:
> Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
>
> > Since the license is strictly construed against the drafter the
> >  license, because of promissory estoppel, would provide a 
> > defense to copyright infringement.
>
> As I recall, when I asked you for what was promised, I got no 
> answer.

"You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion
of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and
distribute such modifications or work. . ." It's called a promise
for a grant of rights.