[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed
From: |
ray |
Subject: |
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed |
Date: |
23 Apr 2009 01:08:29 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) |
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:00:57 -0500, DFS wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
>> Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn.
>>
>> FSF runs from another opportunity to prove legal enforceability claims
>> for the GPL. Just as I predicted. Listen for the Freetard spin.
>>
>> The Cisco v. Free Software case was dismissed with prejudice and
>> without award of court costs. (On PACER court record 4/22/2009)
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Rjack :)
>
>
>
> The "Free" software bozos requested "the Court order Defendant to
> account for and disgorge to Plaintiff all profits derived by Defendant
> from its unlawful acts;"
>
> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/complaint-2008-12-11.pdf
>
> LMAO! They sure do sound greedy for a not-for-profit, tax-exampt public
> charity.
>
> It should be unlawful to dump crappy open source code on the market for
> less than the cost to produce it.
Well DooFuS, one could also argue it should be unlawful to dump
propietary code on the market for exhorbitant prices.
- Cisco v FSF dismissed, Rjack, 2009/04/22
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, DFS, 2009/04/23
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed,
ray <=
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, amicus_curious, 2009/04/23
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2009/04/23
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2009/04/24
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, John Hasler, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, John Hasler, 2009/04/24