gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPL traitor !


From: Hadron
Subject: Re: GPL traitor !
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 19:02:03 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux)

Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> writes:

> In gnu.misc.discuss Hadron <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> In gnu.misc.discuss Doctor Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:45:12 +0000 (UTC), Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>
>>>>> It seems Matt has long misunderstood the GPL.  
>
>>>> Like 99 percent of people who through some unfortunate process come in
>>>> contact with it.
>
>>> I wouldn't know, since I don't know any such people.  I know lots of
>>> people whose contact with the GPL is benign, rewarding and profitable.
>
>> You might need to educate a few Gnome developers then you are claiming
>> they need to move to some third world shit hole to live on their OSS
>> "donations".
>
> Please don't project your opinions onto me with insulting words like
> "claiming".  I have expressed no opinion on "third world shit holes", and
> don't intend to.  I have no need whatsoever to educate Gnome developers.
>
> As I said, I don't know anybody whose contact with the GPL has been
> through "some unfortunate process".

Then you haven't looked very far.

>
>>> I can't really see where misfortune enters into any contact with the
>>> GPL.  Stupidity, certainly, but hardly misfortune.
>
>> Day in day out the GPL is turned inside out. It's easy to CLAIM it's
>> easy but fact does not bond with your fiction.
>
> Huh?  The GPL is perfectly plain and straightforward and means what it
> says.  You don't even need to get a lawyer to explain it to you, though
> you certainly should consult one if you're going to be redistributing
> GPL'd software.

And yet meanwhile in the real world people are confused. You're so full
of your own opinion you can not see the reality from your ivory tower.

>
> The only people who "find" it difficult to understand are those who wish
> to violate it and FUDsters who wish to propagate the unfounded notion
> that nasty unforseen things can happen to people using or modifying GPL'd
> software.
>
> And please lose that nasty "CLAIM" word.

I used it incorrectly there. "you" was supposed to be "who".

-- 
In view of all the deadly computer viruses that have been spreading
lately, Weekend Update would like to remind you: when you link up to
another computer, you’re linking up to every computer that that
computer has ever linked up to. — Dennis Miller


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]