[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++ |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:21:31 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 2/3/2010 2:15 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
A "work based on the Program" is a modified version which is a
derivative work.
No. A "work based on the Program" is a work which contains all
or part of the Program, transformed or not. It may be a derivative
work if it substantially modified, but more likely it is only a
combined work.
it is wholly incorporated by linking.
Quoting Hyman in his sane mode:
:> Linking, either dynamically or statically, does not
:> constitute a significant auctorial transformation of
:> an existing work, and therefore the person performing
:> the link step does not gain copyright to a derivative
:> work, since no such work is created.
Now go take your meds again and witness that your insane suggestion
about linking creating a modified/derivative work is utter bull.
A program statically linked with a library is not a derivative
work of that library because no auctorial transformation of the
library has taken place. However, the linked program is a combined
work, analogous to an anthology, and such a work requires permission
from the rights holders of each component before it may be copied
and distributed. Permission for incorporation into a combined work
must be sought separately for each instance of incorporation.
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, (continued)
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/05
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/05
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/05
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/05
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/05
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Florian Weimer, 2010/02/02
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/03
- Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/04