Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Well, if the GPLed source is made available in the aftermath, it stands

How do you know that, silly dak?

Because "the version numbers on the links match," right you retard?

Given that comrade Hyman is "insufficiently motivated to go set up a
GNU/Linux system so that I can do the builds." LOL why don't YOU dak go
and try make a test trying to create
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp binary from the
source tarball available on the actiontec's site dak?

Please report back to us your results and evidence that the said source
code is "complete corresponding source code under the GPL."

TIA.

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system 
so that I can do the builds."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)