|
| From: | Hyman Rosen |
| Subject: | Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:42:58 -0500 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 2/22/2010 12:37 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Generally speaking, violation of a license constitutes copyright infringement in pretty much the same way (zero, zilch, none) as violation of a renting license constitutes a trespass, you retard Hyman.
<http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf>
Copyright holders who engage in open source licensing have
the right to control the modification and distribution of
copyrighted material. ... Copyright licenses are designed
to support the right to exclude; money damages alone do not
support or enforce that right. The choice to exact
consideration in the form of compliance with the open source
requirements of disclosure and explanation of changes, rather
than as a dollar-denominated fee, is entitled to no less legal
recognition.
Court vs. crank. Court wins.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |