gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:43:59 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 
On 2/22/2010 4:33 PM, RJack wrote:

the entirely unremarkable principle
that “uses” that violate a license agreement constitute copyright
infringement only when those uses would infringe in the absence of any
license agreement at all


Yes. And the use here is copying and distribution, which
infringes in the absence of any license agreement at all.


(ND CA)


Of what use is it to quote a district court ruling that
was overturned on appeal?
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]