gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:18:40 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux)

Alexander Terekhov <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> It is actually not true that it is "nur einseitig verpflichtend" since
>
> It's "einseitig verpflichtend" as in
>
> http://dejure.org/gesetze/BGB/518.html
>
> and 
>
> http://vwi.andre-grahl.de/Recht/pdf/03_Script.pdf
>
> "Pflichtenbegründende Rechtsgeschäfte (Verpflichtungsgeschäfte)
> - es werden einseitige oder mehrseitige Pflichtenverhältnisse begründet
> einseitig: Schenkung, Leihe, Erlass
> zweiseitig: Kaufvertrag, Dienstvertrag, Werkvertrag
> mehrseitig: Gesellschaftervertrag"
>
> you crackpot dak.

A "Schenkung" is "einseitig verpflichtend" between the parties of the
"Schenkungsvertrag", however, as a consequence of the transfer of
ownership, the "Verpflichtungen" connected with ownership will be
established for the new owner.

For this reason among others, you can't do a "Schenkungsvertrag" without
the consent of the receiving party.

-- 
David Kastrup


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]