From the Best Buy et. al. case

[RJack]

From the  Erik Andersen vs. Best Buy et. al. Scheduling
Order entered Feb. 22, 2010 appearing on PACER as case no. 1:09-cv-10155-SAS




"Shira A. Scheindlin U.S.D.J.
...

2. A concise statement of the issues as they then appear;

Pending results of Defendants' investigations, Defendants
intend to show that the Plaintiff's have no damages, that
the Defendants did nothing actionable under copyright law, that
any alleged copying was not willful, that Plaintiffs are not
the proper parties, that the copyright held by Mr. Andersen
is not applicable, and that, since being put on notice of
the purported requirements of the general public license,
Defendants have endeavored to come into compliance with what
can only be described as a 'moving target'."



Sincerely,
RJack :)