gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Settlements


From: RJack
Subject: Re: Settlements
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:07:16 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/25/2010 12:58 PM, RJack wrote:
When have SFLC lawyers and any defendant company's lawyers
appeared in any federal court hearing and announced a settlement?
I'd be glad to acknowledge any such settlement that you can
document.

<http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-22/amazon-com-perfect-10-settle-suit-over-nude-pictures-update1-.html>
 Today’s hearing had been scheduled to hear arguments...

They appeared at the hearing to tell the judge that the hearing was
no longer required. The desperation of your arguments only
emphasizes their futility.

From pacer 2:05-cv-04753-AHM-SH End date: 2/25/2010

"02/24/2010 380 MINUTES Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard
Matz: Court is advised that the parties have reached a settlement. Accordingly, the Court DENIES AS MOOT (1) Plaintiff's Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment as to Contributory Liability for Copyright
Infringement and Ineligibility for Dmca Safe Harbor 172 and (2)
Defendant Alexa's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment on Perfect 10's
Contributory Infringement Claim and Motion for Summary Judgment on
Plaintiff Perfect 10's Claims for Direct Infringement and Vicarious
Liability 253 . The parties are to submit their dismissal by not
later than 3/8/2010. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is
removed from this Court's active caseload without prejudice to the
right, upon good cause shown within 30 days, to request a status
conference be scheduled if settlement is not consummated. This Court
retains jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not
prejudice any party to this action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.)
Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (jp) (Entered: 02/24/2010)"

When was the last time that a court in a GPL case was "advised that
the parties have reached a settlement" Hyman?

regards, alexander.

P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system so
that I can do the builds."

Hyman Rosen <address@hidden> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <address@hidden> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

-- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive
derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as
GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU
cannot.)

Troll vs. Hyman's fertile imagination. Troll wins another one. ROFL.

Sincerely,
RJack :)


"[U]nless we wish anarchy to prevail within the federal judicial
system, a precedent of this Court must be followed by the lower
federal courts no matter how misguided the judges of those courts
may think it to be."; HUTTO v. DAVIS, 454 U.S. 370 (1982).

"An unlicensed use of the copyright is not an infringement unless it
conflicts with one of the specific exclusive rights conferred by the
copyright statute. Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken, 422 U.S., at
154-155."; SONY CORP. OF AMER. v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, INC., 464 U.S.
417 (1984).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]