gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Settlements


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Settlements
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:04:53 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux)

Alexander Terekhov <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
>> 
>> Alexander Terekhov <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > David Kastrup wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> But the point is: until I pass the cash register, there is no way of
>> >
>> > Uh retard dak.
>> 
>> Ah, your standard way of saying that you have run out of arguments
>> again.
>> 
>> > http://lawww.de/Library/242/loesung.html
>> 
>> Answers without questions?
>
> Go to doctor dak.
>
> http://www.ladendiebstahl.de/Strafgesetz.htm
>
> "Sobald ein Täter eine Ware in seine Kleidung oder in eine mitgeführte
> Tasche gesteckt hat, ist sein Gewahrsam begründet und damit der
> Diebstahl vollendet."
>
> http://www.gutefrage.net/frage/ist-das-ladendiebstahl
>
> "Sobald ein Täter eine Ware in seine Kleidung oder in eine mitgeführte
> Tasche gesteckt hat, ist sein Gewahrsam begründet und damit der
> Diebstahl vollendet."

You are again citing a comment rather than the law.  And the particular
sentence makes little enough sense:

"As soon as a perpetrator puts an item into his clothes or a carried
bag, his confinement is justified, and thus the theft is completed."

That's shaking the order and dependencies of the acts up rather
absurdly.

-- 
David Kastrup


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]