Re: GPL misappropriation

[Hyman Rosen]

On 3/22/2010 4:35 PM, RJack wrote:
> No matter what you say or how many time you say it, BSD licensed code
> remains under the BSD license and not the GPL license.

Derivative works of BSD-licensed code may be otherwise licensed.
Indeed, that's why anti-GPL cranks think it's a superior license.

> Incorporate away DAK -- all you want -- still, BSD licensed code remains
> under the BSD license and not the GPL license.

The creator of a derivative work may license his work in any way
he chooses, and the BSD license does not forbid that.