gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPL misappropriation


From: RJack
Subject: Re: GPL misappropriation
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:10:15 -0000
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)

David Kastrup wrote:
RJack <address@hidden> writes:

David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov <address@hidden> writes:

David Kastrup wrote: [...]
BSDL licensed material does not restrict sublicensing to
identical terms.
"Absent an explicit grant of sublicensing rights, no right to sublicense is generally presumed.5 ... 5 Raufast SA v. Kniers Pizzazz, Ltd., 208 USPQ (BNA) 699 (EDNY 1980). "
What about "Absent an explicit grant of sublicensing rights" do
you not understand?
Unfortunately DAK your lack of understanding of the English
language involving the use of the word "exclusive" in:

"ยง 106. Exclusive rights in copyrighted works. Subject to sections
107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this title has the
exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following:. . ."


What about "and to authorize" did you not understand?
understand common concepts your absurd
protestations do not gain any plausibility.

Read it again DAK boy. They have the right to authorize *six* enumerated
things:

************************************************************************
(1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords;

(2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;

(3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the
public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or
lending;

(4) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works,
pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, to perform
the copyrighted work publicly;

(5) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works,
pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the
individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to
display the copyrighted work publicly; and

(6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work
publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.
************************************************************************
None of those *six* things involve "authorizing" others to "authorize".
You're seeing double dear DAK.

Sincerely,
RJack :)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]