gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Significance of the GP licence.


From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Significance of the GP licence.
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 17:55:50 +0200

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> On 5/5/2010 10:56 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > "DENIED"
> > http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13584730711160488510
> 
> That's because the standards required for a preliminary
> injunction are high. In the judge's words:
> <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13584730711160488510>

"With respect to the General Public License ("GPL"), MYSQL has
not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the
merits or irreparable harm."

HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED

*HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED*, YOU IDIOT.

And yes, the case was about alleged contract breach, you retard. NOT
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, YOU MORON.

http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/MySQLcounterclaim.pdf
("COUNT VIII Breach of Contract (GPL License)")

"                      COUNT VIII 
              Breach of Contract (GPL License)"
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Take your meds Hyman, take your meds.

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
originality standards required by copyright law."

Hyman Rosen <address@hidden> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <address@hidden> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]