gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple


From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:57:33 -0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1

On 8/5/2010 11:18 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://digital-law-online.info/lpdi1.0/treatise27.html
(VI.D.3. Section 117 Adaptations)

Yes. That's not a "fair use" permission as the OP claimed.
In any case, the GPL says <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
    You may make, run and propagate covered works that you
    do not convey, without conditions so long as your license
    otherwise remains in force.
so the OP was wrong (except in the most trivial sense) that the
GPL requires anything for modification without conveyance.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]