gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple


From: ZnU
Subject: Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:58:02 -0000
User-agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)

In article <address@hidden>,
 RJack <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 8/5/2010 3:34 PM, Hyman Rosen wrote:
> > On 8/5/2010 3:11 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> >> Hyman Rosen is spin doctoring CAFC's Jacobsen opinion
> >
> > The court ruled that the copyright conditions found in a specific
> > open license were indeed copyright conditions such that copying
> > without honoring them is copyright violation.
> 
> And the Artistic License is not the GPL license. This is cognitively
> unacceptable to GPL crackpots on who have built their identity on
> asserting false legal claims concerning the GPL license.

In what way are they different such that the Artistic License creates 
copyright conditions but the GPL does not?

[snip]

-- 
"The game of professional investment is intolerably boring and over-exacting to
anyone who is entirely exempt from the gambling instinct; whilst he who has it
must pay to this propensity the appropriate toll." -- John Maynard Keynes


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]