[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:59:47 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 |
On 8/16/2010 2:08 PM, RJack wrote:
You can't have it both ways.
As you quoted, "embodied *inextricably* in the line-by-line instructions".
Most implementations of patented processes are not so embodied, and thus
the patent poses no impediment to the copyright.
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, (continued)
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, ZnU, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hadron, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, ZnU, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08