Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling)

[Alexander Terekhov]

You idiot.

Nothing you quoted suggests that CTA retained and used "upgrade" copies
(or sold them to someone else).

Oh well... to repeat:

As you know, the ruling actually doesn't severely affect me (and
probably you) because I live in a small European region which is a home
of Mercedes and Porsche (but I drive BMW), the problem is the following
scenario, silly:

I, as an owner of multiple http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navigon
(http://www.navigon.com/portal/de/index.html) material objects, while
taking vacation and visiting the territory of the 9th Cir. jurisdiction,
receive from local http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navigon
(http://www.navigon.com/portal/de/index.html) representitive (in US) an
offer to buy the latest and greatest version at discounted price.

The fine print says that I must "destroy" all my navigons previously
bought from Navigon. 

Instead, I sell all my old navigons to the Ninth Circuit for 0.01 EURO.

Question: Am I guilty of trafficking in stolen goods?

Is Ninth Circuit also a criminal for using one of my old navigons?

regards,
alexander.

-- 
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)