Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernorscandalous ruling)

[Snit]

Alexander Terekhov stated in post 4C98D184.68A368DA@web.de on 9/21/10 8:38
AM:

> 
> Snit wrote:
> [...]
>>> http://www.goodnewsblog.com/2006/04/17/lotologist-has-amassed-250000-used-lo
>>> tt
>>> o-tickets
>>> 
>>> "Lotologist has amassed 250,000 used lotto tickets
>> 
>> And if someone had already cashed one in, should he be able to do so again?
> 
> He may "do so again" by selling used ("already cashed one in") winner
> ticket to one of his collector friends for a price potentially even
> higher than original cash option. What is your problem with that?

Nothing... but he cannot use it to collect from the state again.  I have no
problem with someone selling game media... but if part of the game is an
online account, the account might not be transferrable.  So be it.  Heck,
maybe someone wants to sell old CDs as coasters.  :)

-- 
"YOU were the person claiming that the ~ told people to go to
HardDrive/users/username/ while I stated the ~ indicated the name of the
hard drive only." -- Tim Adams