Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specific to his hardware?

[David Kastrup]

RJack <user@example.net> writes:

> The GPL is unenforceable under contract law and gives rise to an
> equitable action for promissory estoppel.

Oxymoron.  "promissory estoppel" means that a good faith interpretation
implies a permission while there is none, "unenforceable" means that a
good faith interpretation implies a restriction while there is none.

Your brain is leaking out of both ears.  At one point of time, you'll
need to decide in which of those opposite directions you want to troll.

-- 
David Kastrup