Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specificto his hardware?

[Hyman Rosen]

On 10/12/2010 11:45 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > > > The GPL is a straightforward copyright license. Each time a court
> > > > has had an opportunity to read it, they regarded it as such.
> > >
> > > To which federal courts are you referring?
> >
> > The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals:
> > <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3689055814945636124>
>
> Uh silly Hyman...
>
> >       the GPL ... is a cooperative agreement that facilitates
> >       production of new derivative works
>
> The BSD agreement facilitates production of new derivative works even
> more.

Your fellow crank asked which federal courts looked at the GPL
as a valid copyright license, and I responded with a number of
examples. Why are you referring to a different license?