[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitC
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourt of Appeals |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:02:10 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> > suppose I simply provide a written offer regarding source code.
> > You come to me for the source code with that offer.
> > I [refuse].
> > How does that would violate the copyright act?
>
> It wouldn't. You would have correctly complied with the conditions
> for copying, and therefore there is no copyright violation. But I
> now possess a written promise from you which you are not honoring,
> so my course of action would be to sue for breach of contract, not
> of the GPL but of your written offer.
You're making progress Hyman!!!
But what does a "condition" to GIVE written offer has to do with rights
spelled out in 17 USC 106 in the first place?
The nexus is non-existent.
See the light now?
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourtof Appeals, (continued)
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourtof Appeals, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/21
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourtof Appeals, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/21
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourtof Appeals, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/21
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourtof Appeals, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/21
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourtof Appeals, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/21
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/21
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/21
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourt of Appeals, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/21
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourtof Appeals, RJack, 2010/12/21
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourtof Appeals, David Kastrup, 2010/12/22
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourt of Appeals,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourt of Appeals, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/21
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), ajawamnet, 2010/12/09
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling), Joe Fineman, 2010/12/08
- Re: The GPL and Patents: ROFL, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08