gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud


From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:06:17 -0000

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Hyman Rosen wrote:
> >
> > [... attorneys' fees to Best Buy Inc. counsel ... ]
> >
> >> According to the document that AT posted, <http://terekhov.de/204.pdf>:
> >>          Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, plaintiffs
> >>      Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. and Erik Anderson and defendant
> >>      BEST BUY CO.,INC hereby dismiss their claims against each other from
> >>      within this action WITH PREJUDICE with respect to any past claims for
> >>      certain Insignia Blu-ray products (NS-WBRDVD, NS-BRDVD3, NS-BRHTIB,
> >>      NS-BRDVD3-CA, NS-WBRDVD2, NS-BRDVD4, NS-BRDVD4-CA, NS-BRDVD, 
> >> NS-2BRDVD,
> >>      and NS-BDLIVB01) and without costs to any party. Plaintiffs maintain
> >>      this action against all other defendants.
> >>
> >> Why do you claim, in contradiction to this document, that SFLC
> >> paid any costs to Best Buy?
> >
> > Not in contradiction. Court costs != attorney's fees. Apples and
> > oranges, Hyman.
> 
> So the payments are just your personal fantasies again, made up to match
> your impressively off-skew view of legal matters.

I made no claims regarding payments, silly. I just pointed out that such
payments are not in contradiction.

regards,
alexander.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]