gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thermite and 9/11


From: Peter Köhlmann
Subject: Re: Thermite and 9/11
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:07:06 -0000
User-agent: KNode/4.4.10

Mark S Bilk wrote:

> On Dec 6, 5:28 pm, Peter Köhlmann <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Mark S Bilk wrote:
>> > Thermite and 9/11
>>
>> > On Dec 6, 4:46 pm, Torre Starnes <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:40:48 -0800 (PST), Mark S Bilk wrote:
>> >> > For more than ten years, there's been a huge flood of lying
>> >> > anti-Linux propaganda posts sent to COLA, about 500,000 of
>> >> > them.  Almost all have been posted via anonymous false
>> >> > identities, like "Lt Cmdr. Gaston J. Feeblebunny".
>>
>> >> Don't you have some thermite to analyze, Mark S. Bilk?
>>
>> >> For those that may not know, Mark S. Bilk is a truther who
>> >> believes the 9-11 attacks were an inside job.
>> >> Let's just say the boy is not playing with a full kit of marbles.
>>
>> > Here's the scientific research report that proves in great detail
>> > that a high-tech type of thermite incendiary was involved in
>> > the destruction of the World Trade Center towers on 9/11/2001:
>> >
>> > http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf
>> >
>> > There's no way that a gang of Arabs could have gotten into
>> > those buildings and planted tons of thermite in or around
>> > the support columns in the basement.
>> >
>> > Here's my web page with links to the various 9/11 research
>> > websites:
>> >
>> > http://cosmicpenguin.com/911/
>> >
>> > If you believe that anyone who thinks 911 was an inside job
>> > "is not playing with a full kit of marbles", as the Microsoft
>> > propaganda agent posting through the false identity "Torre
>> > Starnes" says, please read this short article, about the reasons
>> > why people find it hard to accept:
>> >
>> > http://cosmicpenguin.com/911/KenJenkins_9-11_psychology.pdf
> 
>> Idiot
>> With an apology to the "real idiots" out there. You guys certainly don't
>> deserve to be compared to such a dimbulb like this
> 
> Peter, calling someone "idiot" and "dimbulb" does not in any
> way refute what they've said, it just makes you appear to be
> irrational. 

There is absolutely nothing we have to talk about. I tend not to talk to 
dirt. And you are even dumber than dirt



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]