[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:48:28 +0200
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
Wikipedia have an amoral approach of what is an encyclopedia.
For example, Wikipedia rejects the use of the real name "GNU/Linux" in
articles about this system because GNU/Linux is often called "Linux".
Non-free software is an example of that amoral approach and thrives on
it. Thus, in the long run it would be self-defeating for freedom to
adopt that approach. Wikipedia uses this amoral approach, and makes it a
This amoral approach is similar to the amoral "open source" approach of
the FLOSS community.
: I use the neutral term because I want to talk about the community
which uses and develops this software genre, without refers to a
particular approach for view this community. I use "free software" in
other cases, because I promote the freedom-oriented approach.