comment on the LilyPond documantation

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> Now, Mup is shareware, so in order to make money they have have a clean
> docu. But I really feel this is something important that needs attention
> for Lily to reach out to "the people". Needless to say, I'd much prefer to
> do my work in Lily, since it's open source and have much more elegant
> code.
> 
> Comments????

Yes: why don't you try to figure out how Lily works, and write the
documentation yourself. Other will love you for it.


--
Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden    | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/