gnu-music-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: accidental scoping


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: accidental scoping
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:07:09 +0100

>    Mats> No, it seems that the `forget' patch has been forgotten.
>    Mats> Here it comes again, still just as valid for 1.3.101.
>
> I'm getting:
> 
> address@hidden lily]$ make
> rm -f ./out/local-key-engraver.dep; DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT="./out/local-ker.dep 
> ./out/local-key-engraver.o" c++ -c  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -Iinclude -I./out 
> -I../lib/include -I../lib/./out -I../flower/include -I../flower/./out 
> -I../flower/include -g     -g   -I/usr/include -Wall  -W -Wmissing-prototypes 
> -Wconversion  local-key-engraver.cc -o out/local-key-engraver.o
> local-key-engraver.cc: In method `void 
> Local_key_engraver::process_acknowledged()':
> local-key-engraver.cc:106: parse error before `('
> local-key-engraver.cc:105: warning: unused variable `bool tie_changes'
> local-key-engraver.cc:121: `prev_acc' undeclared (first use this function)
> local-key-engraver.cc:121: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> local-key-engraver.cc:121: for each function it appears in.)
> local-key-engraver.cc:121: `a' undeclared (first use this function)
> local-key-engraver.cc:124: `note_l' undeclared (first use this function)
> local-key-engraver.cc:127: `support_l' undeclared (first use this function)
> local-key-engraver.cc:85: warning: unused variable `bool forget'
> local-key-engraver.cc:138: `forget' undeclared (first use this function)
> local-key-engraver.cc:138: `tie_changes' undeclared (first use this function)
> local-key-engraver.cc:144: `localsig' undeclared (first use this function)
> local-key-engraver.cc:144: `o' undeclared (first use this function)
> local-key-engraver.cc:145: `n' undeclared (first use this function)
> local-key-engraver.cc:149: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
> make: *** [out/local-key-engraver.o] Error 1
> address@hidden lily]$ 
> 
> Am I doing something stupid?

No, I did! Remove the '&&' before '(note_l->forceacc_b_'
on line 106.

      /Mats




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]