[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FW: Professional ???
From: |
Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: |
Re: FW: Professional ??? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Dec 2000 19:19:19 +0100 |
> > Even if it might be slightly off-topic I would like to share my very
> > positive experience with the shareware
>
> I do not consider this slightly off topic. Advocating non free
> software on a GNU list suggests a more than moderate level of
> ignorance.
Please don't over-react. Since Christian is one of the few
people who has used both MusixTeX, Lilypond and MUP
seriously, I have specifically asked him to provide some
feedback on the relative merits of the different systems
in order to bring in some new ideas on what could be
improved.
/Mats
- Re: FW: Professional ???, (continued)
- Re: FW: Professional ???, Juergen Reuter, 2000/12/13
- Re: FW: Professional ???, David Raleigh Arnold, 2000/12/14
- Vector touchup, Jeff Henrikson, 2000/12/15
- Re: Vector touchup, Christian Mondrup, 2000/12/15
- Vector touchup, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2000/12/15
- Re: Vector touchup, David Raleigh Arnold, 2000/12/15
- Re: Vector touchup, François Pinard, 2000/12/15
- Re: FW: Professional ???, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2000/12/13
- Re: FW: Professional ???, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2000/12/13
- Re: FW: Professional ???, Peter Schaffter, 2000/12/14
- Re: FW: Professional ???,
Mats Bengtsson <=
- Converters (was: Re: FW: Professional ???), Laura Conrad, 2000/12/13
- Re: Converters (was: Re: FW: Professional ???), Laurent Martelli, 2000/12/13
Re: FW: Professional ???, Mats Bengtsson, 2000/12/13
FW: Professional ???, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2000/12/17
Re: FW: Professional ???, Werner Icking, 2000/12/13