gnu-system-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No to StowFS!


From: olafBuddenhagen
Subject: Re: No to StowFS!
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 08:07:11 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Hi,

> StowFS doesn't create links, it uses unionfs. The difference of both
> is almost simple, since with links you can remove stow and everything
> will keep working. With StowFS you need to have stowfs running to get
> things working (this "curiously" create a bootstrap problem

You are basically claiming that having redundancy is better than
creating an alternate view on the fly.

Every database specialist, every capable programmer; in fact anyone
doing serious stuff with computers, will tell you that this is
absolutely wrong.

-antrik-




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]