[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about GNU Hurd
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: about GNU Hurd |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:28:49 -0400 |
But, I do not think that this is the right solution. There are too
many chefs trying to cook different stews, and trying to serve it as a
single dish; and some only taking up space. I think the only way to
go forward is to remove maintainers, and get one or two people. It
will always be that Roland and Bushenll are the ones who decide what
goes into the tree. And as long as this persists, the Hurd will not
move forward.
It doesn't have to work that way. Another maintainer could install
fixes if they don't respond.
But we do need a good volunteer for the job; someone who is skilled
both technically and with people.
- Re: about GNU Hurd, (continued)
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/07/20
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/07/21
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/21
- Re: about GNU Hurd, arnuld, 2007/07/21
- LiveCD (Was: Re: about GNU Hurd), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/07/21
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/07/21
- Re: about GNU Hurd,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Barry deFreese, 2007/07/23
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/30
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/07/30
- Re: about GNU Hurd, arnuld, 2007/07/31
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/07/25
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Stephan Peijnik, 2007/07/25
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/26
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Michael Heath, 2007/07/31
- Wiki (was: about GNU Hurd), Thomas Schwinge, 2007/07/31
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Claudio Fontana, 2007/07/30