[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu3dkit-discuss] Re: [Gnu3dkit-dev] Re: GeometryKit documentation

From: Philippe C . D . Robert
Subject: [Gnu3dkit-discuss] Re: [Gnu3dkit-dev] Re: GeometryKit documentation
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:16:20 +0200

On Monday, October 21, 2002, at 05:19  Uhr, Brent Gulanowski wrote:
On Monday, October 21, 2002, at 10:58  AM, Brent Gulanowski wrote:
On Monday, October 21, 2002, at 10:47  AM, Brent Gulanowski wrote:
On Sunday, October 20, 2002, at 09:55 AM, Philippe C.D. Robert wrote:


I started to create an API reference documentation for the GeometryKit using HeaderDoc just yesterday. The HTML files are not yet in CVS but the comments (as far as they exist already), so to get the reference, run HeaderDoc on the GeometryKit source directory, and voila, there it is...:-) There is still some mistery going on though, ie. not all TOCs are correct (see MatrixFunc for example), if anyone knows what is going on there, please let me >>> know!

MatrixFunc comes out fine for me -- the methods are re-organized alphabetically, however. G3DBox, Line, Quaternion, Sphere, Plane, Intersecting and all the Matrices aren't recognized as ObjC classes and their method documentation is being ignored.

The problem is definitely that headerdoc doesn't like @class being used by Objective-C grammar. All of the headers I created that had @class preprocessor directive did not produce complete documenation html.

This has been filed as bug #136 at
(requires an account to login)

Uhm, unless I miss sth this works for me - what is the problem exactly (well at least for these classes which do contain some description)?

BTW bugzilla is only configured for HeaderDoc 6.x, but 7.2 is the current version...

Philippe C.D. Robert

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]