Re: [gnugo-devel] arend_1_15.1: move valuation

[Gunnar Farneback]

Arend wrote:
> The patch broke endgame:208, but that is because of a missing followup value
> of the correct move N1. It did not change anything else in endgame.tst, nor
> in my test suite or Nicklas' (where a few endgame problems are included).
> (I did not run full regression tests as this takes ~13h on my PC.)

I've run the full regressions now and it turns out that endgame:208
was the only unexpected result. This indicates that we find way too
few reverse_followup_values currently and/or have too few relevant
test cases. It would be valuable if we could extend endgame.tst
substantially.

> I guess it should be worth having the more precise formula; where it
> breaks s.th., we should then correct the responsible followup/reverse
> followup values.

Agreed.

/Gunnar