gnugo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gnugo-devel] sgf output


From: Gunnar Farneback
Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] sgf output
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 21:48:09 +0200
User-agent: EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7) (with unibyte mode)

Ben wrote:
> For an independent study course (in a scheme to get college credit for
> something go-related) I'm writing a program that will identify "good" joseki
> usage/fuseki patterns based on big libraries of sgf files.  I'm planning on
> using gnugo to generate the libraries by feeding it sgf files with
> semi-randomly generated opening positions in them (--infile <my
> file> --score aftermath --outfile <gnogofile>.... but you guys already knew
> that).  I started playing around with 3.0 about a week before 3.2 was
> released.  When given those options the file 3.0 outputted had all the moves
> from the infile played in it followed by the moves gnugo generated.  The
> file 3.2 generates, however, just has all the infile moves added (AB and AW
> in sgf, as apposed to played in sequence) and the gnugo moves go on from
> there.

The reason for the change is that I found the new format more suitable
for debugging scoring errors.

> I prefer 3.0's output but naturally would rather use 3.2. Is there
> any way to make 3.2 output like 3.0?

Only by modifying the function load_and_score_sgf_file() in
interface/play_solo.c.

> I looked in main.c but didn't see any relevant options... Also, is
> there any way to make gnugo not output the move choice labels and
> comments?

The same comment applies there.

/Gunnar



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]