[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gnugo-devel] use of LOSE in reading.c
|
From: |
Teun Burgers |
|
Subject: |
[gnugo-devel] use of LOSE in reading.c |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:53:06 +0200 |
> Teun wrote:
> > This patch uses LOSE instead of 0 for acode
> > and dcode in reading.c. I think it is better
> > style to use LOSE than 0 since 0 can mean
> > just about everything.
>
> Sorry, but we're quite happy to use 0 in this context.
Who is we? Doesn't include me apparently.
> I don't find
> this change an improvement.
What is the point of the #define LOSE in gnugo.h then?
Teun