[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Patch: Strategic effect for strategic attacks and defe
From: |
Inge Wallin |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Patch: Strategic effect for strategic attacks and defenses |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Oct 2002 23:21:48 +0200 (MEST) |
Arend wrote:
> [a lot of things]
>
> That's not what I meant by magically. connection_value() explicitly uses
> move[tt].territorial_value, so it is clear just from the code in
> value_moves.c that estimate_territorial_value() has to come before
> estimate_strategical_value(). With Inge's patch (and its interaction
> with the caching scheme), this would only be clear together with looking
> at influenc.c.
>
> Inge, maybe you can just use move[pos].territorial_value?
This discussion has been most helpful. I don't have time to work on
it today or tomorrow, but I will look into it after that.
-Inge
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Patch: Strategic effect for strategic attacks and defenses, (continued)
Re: [gnugo-devel] Patch: Strategic effect for strategic attacks and defenses, Arend Bayer, 2002/10/14
Re: [gnugo-devel] Patch: Strategic effect for strategic attacks and defenses, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/10/19
[gnugo-devel] Patch: Strategic effect for strategic attacks and defenses, Teun Burgers, 2002/10/19