[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [gnugo-devel] Reading patch

From: Evan Berggren Daniel
Subject: RE: [gnugo-devel] Reading patch
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:38:36 -0500 (EST)

On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Portela Fernand wrote:

> Evan wrote:
> > I agree, it's a good thing.  This should be completely equivalent to
> > evan_3_10.4b in functionality, but that was rejected for speed reasons.
> I'm not sure I recall correctly, but wasn't it the patch which tried to
> make attack_either() and defend_both() call eachother recursively ?
> In this case, it seems to me that your patch was actually different and
> somewhat more ambitious.

You're right...  seems I can't remember my own patches ;)

I'm not sure why your patch would be slower than the one I had, then...
presumably because we use attack_either more now?

Also, using the candidate move macros is probably cleaner and more

Evan Daniel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]