gnugo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gnugo-devel] Cosmic ,first impression


From: max-d
Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] Cosmic ,first impression
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 20:46:30 +0200

I wrote

> I will run a longer match vs go++ level 4 in order to compare with classic
> gnugo results but i don't expect the results to be as good .
>
> GO++ level 4          54+42=96
> gnugo_3.4 level 10  45+37=82
>


= cosmic_gnugo level 10 =69
= GO++  level 4 = 66

holes in the list below are duplicated games
(this occurs more frequently with cosmic ) .

not deleting du(tri)plicated games give

cosmic_gnugo 79
GO++ 73

deleting games which are identical after 100 moves gives

= cosmic_gnugo 65
= GO++ 58

= cosmic_gnugo won:
3 (35)
4 (12)
5 (12)
7 (32)
9 (17)
10 (4)
12 (23)
13 (17)
14 (37)
16 (31)
20 (22)
21 (38)
25 (14)
27 (22)
28 (54)
29 (10)
32 (14)
36 (35)
37 (29)
38 (5)
39 (33)
40 (24)
41 (17)
42 (33)
50 (11)
51 (22)
55 (12)
59 (31)
61 (56)
63 (6)
64 (16)
66 (19)
67 (2)
68 (1)
71 (7)
72 (8)
75 (14)
76 (66)
82 (1)
84 (16)
85 (6)
93 (20)
96 (23)
97 (10)
99 (13)
100 (4)
101 (7)
102 (20)
103 (32)
105 (23)
106 (21)
107 (88)
112 (7)
115 (23)
117 (55)
119 (12)
121 (24)
124 (23)
127 (32)
128 (12)
129 (40)
130 (44)
133 (17)
136 (9)
140 (70)
141 (14)
143 (1)
147 (29)
149 (34)

= GO++ won:
1 (60)
6 (48)
8 (2)
15 (3)
17 (92)
18 (11)
19 (2)
22 (6)
23 (51)
24 (3)
26 (50)
30 (5)
31 (7)
33 (0)
34 (17)
35 (6)
43 (8)
44 (17)
45 (65)
46 (12)
47 (21)
48 (114)
49 (0)
52 (6)
53 (30)
54 (2)
56 (15)
57 (7)
58 (98)
60 (26)
62 (100)
65 (53)
69 (7)
70 (66)
74 (7)
77 (58)
83 (0)
86 (8)
87 (3)
89 (112)
90 (2)
91 (30)
92 (9)
95 (11)
98 (10)
104 (29)
108 (3)
109 (6)
110 (53)
111 (119)
114 (36)
116 (6)
123 (0)
125 (14)
131 (8)
134 (19)
135 (1)
137 (6)
138 (88)
139 (23)
142 (16)
145 (41)
146 (62)
148 (6)
150 (24)
152 (70)

time = cosmic_gnugo: 43873
time = GO++: 28294
Cosmic seems to be slower than default Gnugo 3.4

md.









reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]