Re: [gnugo-devel] fuseki db

[Arend Bayer]

Gunnar wrote:

>      488 (actually dominates most alternatives based on amateur
>      results)
>      616 (does fine, is by far most popular)
>      649 (ditto)
>      714 (followup to 616. This move is better than ave, but see
>      below)
>      1000 (seems ordinary)

> > So should I make a patch putting those five patterns back in, or just edit
> > the db files?
> 
> Either is fine with me but it would be good if someone more offered
> their opinion on those patterns.

I don't like 616 and 649 for GNU Go. I think the others are fine.

Arend