[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game

From: Gunnar Farnebäck
Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:17:57 +0100
User-agent: EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.9) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

Dan wrote:
> I don't understand how B resigned since the boardsize is not 19x19.

See patch gunnar_7_1.17,

> 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 22 all look like bad moves. Maybe the
> semeai code is at fault. I guess 16 is worth looking at first.

Yes, it looks like the semeai code is involved.

Paul wrote:
> Seems like `resigning.html' should be revised.

So far resigning.html only discusses GNU Go 3.6. This case of
resignation was added in 3.7.1.

> If this behaviour seems undesirable, we should also revise GNU Go
> itself.

Why should it not resign if all stones look dead and it can't come up
with anything better than a pass?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]