gnumed-bugs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-bugs] <bug>: 0.6.rc3 trying to print meds from VM, this


From: Jim Busser
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-bugs] <bug>: 0.6.rc3 trying to print meds from VM, this
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:30:50 -0800

On 2010-01-01, at 9:27 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

>> Well, its exists locally, but not in pycommon: 
>> 
>> address@hidden:~$ find ~ -name gm-print_doc*
>> /home/jbusser/gmrc/c0.6.rc3/client/doc/gm-print_doc.1
>> /home/jbusser/gmrc/c0.6.rc3/external-tools/gm-print_doc
>> /home/jbusser/gmcvs/gnumed/gnumed/client/doc/man-pages/gm-print_doc.1
>> /home/jbusser/gmcvs/gnumed/gnumed/external-tools/gm-print_doc
>> 
>> I was running from rc3. Will resolution be in rc4, or is this some problem 
>> originating at my end?
> 
> gm-print_doc needs to be executable via the system PATH
> (IOW, it needs to be in one of the directories named in
> $PATH, for example /usr/local/bin/).

Does it make the most sense that, within GNUmed, such files (as for medication 
printing) reside in .../external-tools?

1. If so, would it be helpful and nontrivial that that running from tarball or 
cvs (gm-from-cvs.sh) would dynamically and automatically append to the current 
PATH

        .../external-tools

residing at the same level as

        .../client

without which it will forever be extra work for people who would download a 
tarball to get GNUmed to work (properly)

2. Pending any such adjustment, shall I just do it myself, locally?

3. Does the dependency mean that distribution managers should need to copy all 
such files into

        /usr/local/bin

and if so where should such instruction reside?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]